The aim of Verimlilik Dergisi is to convey the results of research in the field of productivity to its readers within the framework of scientific principles and to contribute to the development of productivity science and awareness in this way.
Due to the interdisciplinary nature of the concept of productivity, articles published in Verimlilik Dergisi have a wide variety of topics. Verimlilik Dergisi publishes theoretical and applied research that addresses issues related to measuring and improving productivity. The target audience of Verimlilik Dergisi is mainly academicians working in productivity-related disciplines, professionals continuing their research in the field of productivity, students interested in this field, readers, as well as managers and employees of private and public institutions. Verimlilik Dergisi, which focuses on the disciplines of Business & Economics, Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences, Operations Research & Management Science and Public Administration in general, primarily includes research articles or review articles in the following titles, including but not limited to:
Verimlilik Dergisi accepts scientific and original articles in the field of productivity in Turkish and English.
The types of articles included in the Verimlilik Dergisi are as follows:
Research Article: These are articles that reflect the findings and results of an original research.
Review Article: These are the articles that review a sufficient number of scientific articles, summarize the subject, make evaluations and interpret the findings by comparing them.
If the reference is an article: Author's surname, initials (year), full title of the article, name of the journal (international abbreviations, if any), Volume number (Issue number), beginning and ending page numbers of the article.
Rahman, M., lambkin, M. and Hussain, D. (2016). "Value Creation and Appropriation Following M&A: A Data Envelopment Analysis", Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5628-5635.
Lee, H.H. and Tan, H.B. (2006). "Technology Transfer, FDI and Economic Growth in the ASEAN Region", Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 11(4), 394-410.
If the reference is a book: Author's surname, initials (year), name of the book, volume number, editor, if any, name of publisher, publication number, place of publication.
Alpaydın, E. (2014). "Introduction to Machine Learning", The MIT Press, London.
If the reference is a chapter from the book: The surname of the chapter author, the initials of the name (year), the name of the chapter, the name of the book from which the chapter is taken, the name of the publisher, the place where it was published.
Vasant, P., Bhattacharya, A. and Abraham, A. (1971). "Measurement of Level-of-Satisfaction of Decision Maker in Intelligent Fuzzy-MCDM Theory: A Generalized Approach", Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decison Making, Editor: Kahraman, C., Springer, LLC, 235-262.
If the reference is the printed thesis: Author's surname, initials (year), the name of the thesis, its type (master's, doctorate), the university and institute where it was presented.
Hughey, A. C. (1933). "The Treatment of the Negro in South Carolina Fiction", Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of South Carolina, Carolina.
If the reference is the congress paper: Author's surname, initials (year), the title of the paper, the name of the congress, the place where it was held, the start and end page numbers of the paper.
Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Vanhala, M. ve Inkinen, H. (2013). "The Impact of Knowledge Management Practices on Organizational Performance", 14th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2013), Kaunas, Lithuania, 356-361.
If the referenced from the web page: Author or responsible institution, Title of the cited item, name of the web page, URL, (Access Date).
BMUS (United States Bone and Joint Initiative), (2020). "The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States", www.boneandjointburden.org, (Accessed: 18.03.2020).
Direct quotations should be given “in quotation marks”. If the quotations are more than 4 lines, the justification method should be used. Blockquotes are written in two tabs, and in blockquotes, the font and size are written in italics to remain the same as the text.
The editor is responsible for all papers published in the journal. The ethical commitments and responsibilities of the editor are as follows:
General Responsibilities
Relations with Readers
Relations with Reviewers
Relations with Authors
Relations with the Editorial Board
Author(s)
Reviewer(s)
Publisher
Verimlilik Dergisi is published by the Ministry of Industry and Technology of the Republic of Turkey. The publisher’s ethical responsibilities are as follows:
Publication Ethics Statement
Verimlilik Dergisi adheres to national and international standards in research and publication ethics. It complies with the Press Law, the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works, and the Regulation on Scientific Research and Publication Ethics in Higher Education Institutions . It has also committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and pays regard to Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (d) published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Notifying the Editor of the Situation Not Complying with the Ethical Principles
In case of a behavior that does not satisfy with the ethical principles referring to the editors, reviewers, writers, or an unethical situation concerning an article in the evaluation process, early view or published in the Verimlilik Dergisi, It should be reported to the e-mail addresses of verimlilikdergisi@sanayi.gov.tr.
PUBLICATION POLICY
General Principles
The Quality of the Studies to be Incorporated in the Journal
Evaluation process
1. Submitted articles are reviewed by dealing with the accompanying points before being submitted to the reviewers, and the articles found sufficient for the evaluation process are assigned to the reviewers:
a. By the Editorial Board, the obedience of the article to the publication principles and publication ethics, scientific quality and originality is checked as proper and general content, and the field to which the work exists is completed.
b. During the reviewers evaluation phase, the reviewer evaluate the full text, which is included to the system by the authors and does not involve any statement about the author(s) of the work.
c. Each reviewer decides the article corresponding to the evaluation criteria in the system; They can introduce the line number and “things to do” in a field where they can reveal the basic corrections and changes, or they can upload them to the system with a supplementary file. They still adopt a judgment statement that points out the evaluation result.
d. The authors take into account the suggestions of the reviewers; but they have the right to complain to the issues they oppose with.
e. A double-blind reviewer evaluation system is used in Verimlilik Dergisi. The “positive” opinion of at least two reviewer is offered for the acceptance of the article for publication. If one of the reviewers gives a “positive” and the other a “negative” opinion, the article is sent to a third reviewer. After two “positive” reviewer opinions, the articles selected for publication are allowed the year and number of publication by the Editorial Board. PDF copies are generated and joined to the system.
f. When the publication date of the related issue becomes, the issue is published and caused clear.
2. From the authors of the articles other than the review type to be employed for publication in all journals indexed in TRDizin for the year 2020 and under evaluation corresponding to the decisions reached by the proper boards of TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TRDizin;
a. For research that involves data collection through methods such as scales, questionnaires, interviews, observations, describing and detailing the ethics committee approval (name, decision date and number) of the candidate article on the first-last page and method section
b. Include in the article the information that the knowledgeable consent/consent form has been noticed,
c. Submitting the proofs of the ethical principles in the data collection process (such as having permission from others for the use of scales, questionnaires, documents) in the article,
d. In the articles, it will be requested to point out that research and publication ethics are kept.
3. The article will go to the reviewer evaluation stage after the necessary documents specified in article 2 are uploaded.
4. When a decision is made to “correct” the submitted articles, the authors must make the necessary corrections and upload the final version of the article to the system within 15 days. If the corrections are not made and sent within the specified time, the Editorial Board has the right to reject the article.
5. It is foreseen that the article evaluation process in the journal will last for a maximum of 6 months for each article, depending on the reviewer’s evaluations.
6. The author(s) take into account the criticisms, suggestions and corrections of the reviewers and the Editorial Board. If there are issues that they disagree with, they have the right to state their reasons. The author(s) of the accepted and unpublished articles are informed, but the article texts are not returned.
7. The author always has the right to withdraw his article. However, due to the system of Dergipark, the articles that have been appointed as reviewers cannot be withdrawn by the author. In order for the author to withdraw his article, the evaluation process must be completed. Author(s) who want to withdraw their articles can make a request via the signed Article Withdrawal Form.
8. No more than one article by an author is not published in an issue.
Plagiarism Detection
In order to keep and promote the reviewing process, the similarity score of the papers delivered to our journal is detected. If the similarity score fixed before the referee is assigned is above 20%, the article is expressed to the author without starting the reviewer interpretation process. An assessment process is involved for plagiarism detected after publication and an editorial note is published in the journal for readers.
Grievance Mechanism
When the reader looks at a significant error or mistake in a paper published in the Verimlilik Dergisi, or receives any objections about the editorial composition (plagiarism, duplicate articles, etc.), the grievances can be represented by sending an e-mail to verimlilikdergisi@sanayi .gov.tr Since the grievances will afford an excuse for the improvement of the journal, we will meet the grievances and answer rapidly and kindly.
Fee Policy
Verimlilik Dergisi does not require evaluation, application and publication fees or related payments from authors for published and electronic articles or contribution.
Conflicts of Interest
In the event that those who are in boards of Verimlilik Dergisi publish articles in the Journal, all their duties in the relevant issue are suspended. Violation of thedouble-blind peer-review process is not allowed in any way. Such publications cannot exceed 1/3 of the total number of articles.
The editor guarantees that the publication process of the studies is completed in an independent and impartial manner, taking into account the conflicts of interest between the author(s), referees and other editors. Dec. In studies with more than one author, a statement of contribution rate, a statement of support and gratitude, if any, and a statement of conflict should be included at the end of the study where the referee process has been completed.
In Verimlilik Dergisi no fees are charged for publishing, reading and downloading articles. Likewise, there is no fee charged during the referee evaluation process.
Journal of Productivity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)